From 9f8e013dd43b975685bed8cc4ceeb3ec2f44bad4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris McDonough Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:59:29 +0000 Subject: Spelling. --- docs/narr/introduction.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/narr/introduction.rst b/docs/narr/introduction.rst index bc2c2c8a1..b277d8666 100644 --- a/docs/narr/introduction.rst +++ b/docs/narr/introduction.rst @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ job of why explaining why they don't use "MVC" acronym: :mod:`repoze.bfg` uses terminology similar to Django. The skeleton code generator of :mod:`repoze.bfg` generates a directory layout very -simliar to the directory layout suggested by the `Django Book +similar to the directory layout suggested by the `Django Book `_ . Additionally, as suggested above, the concepts of :term:`view`, :term:`model` and :term:`template` are used by :mod:`repoze.bfg` as they would be by Django. @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ it has no reliance on the ZODB package. Likewise, :term:`Django` tends to make the assumption that you're going to want to store your application's data in a relational database. :mod:`repoze.bfg` makes no such assumption; it allows you to use a relational database but -doesn't enourage or discourage an application developer about such a +doesn't encourage or discourage an application developer about such a decision. Why? -- cgit v1.2.3