From fce5cb9e7d4ec5239fc65f3cad80805aaccf207c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chris McDonough Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 03:28:25 +0000 Subject: Docs. --- docs/designdefense.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/designdefense.rst') diff --git a/docs/designdefense.rst b/docs/designdefense.rst index ea6104618..7260ec1ce 100644 --- a/docs/designdefense.rst +++ b/docs/designdefense.rst @@ -630,7 +630,7 @@ I'll argue that URL dispatch is ultimately useful, even if you want to use traversal as well. You can actually *combine* URL dispatch and traversal in :mod:`repoze.bfg` (see :ref:`hybrid_chapter`). One example of such a usage: if you want to emulate something like Zope -2's "Zope Management Interface" UI on top of your model graph (or any +2's "Zope Management Interface" UI on top of your object graph (or any administrative interface), you can register a route like ```` and then associate "management" views in your code by using the ``route_name`` argument @@ -749,11 +749,11 @@ have no equivalent core feature. We consider this an important feature for a particular class of applications (CMS-style applications, which the authors are often commissioned to write) that usually use :term:`traversal` against a -persistent model graph. The model graph contains security +persistent object graph. The object graph contains security declarations as :term:`ACL` objects. Having context-sensitive declarative security for individual objects -in the model graph is simply required for this class of application. +in the object graph is simply required for this class of application. Other frameworks save for Zope just do not have this feature. This is the one of the primary reasons that :mod:`repoze.bfg` was actually written. -- cgit v1.2.3