| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
redirected to ``pyramid_zcml`` locations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to :app:`Pyramid`. A custom role setting was added to ``docs/conf.py`` to
allow for this. (internal)
|
|
|
|
accepts a different ordering of arguments. Previously it was
``(pattern, name, factory=None, predicates=())``. It is now
``(name, pattern, factory=None, predicates=())``. This is in
support of consistency with ``configurator.add_route``.
- The ``repoze.bfg.urldispatch.RoutesMapper.connect`` method (not an
API) now accepts a different ordering of arguments. Previously it
was ``(pattern, name, factory=None, predicates=())``. It is now
``(name, pattern, factory=None, predicates=())``. This is in
support of consistency with ``configurator.add_route``.
- The ``repoze.bfg.urldispatch.RoutesMapper`` object now has a
``get_route`` method which returns a single Route object or
``None``.
- A new interface ``repoze.bfg.interfaces.IRoute`` was added. The
``repoze.bfg.urldispatch.Route`` object implements this interface.
- The canonical attribute for accessing the routing pattern from a
route object is now ``pattern`` rather than ``path``.
- The argument to ``repoze.bfg.configuration.Configurator.add_route``
which was previously called ``path`` is now called ``pattern`` for
better explicability. For backwards compatibility purposes, passing
a keyword argument named ``path`` to ``add_route`` will still work
indefinitely.
- The ``path`` attribute to the ZCML ``route`` directive is now named
``pattern`` for better explicability. The older ``path`` attribute
will continue to work indefinitely.
- All narrative, API, and tutorial docs which referred to a route
pattern as a ``path`` have now been updated to refer to them as a
``pattern``.
- The routesalchemy template has been updated to use ``pattern`` in
its route declarations rather than ``path``.
|
|
and the ``route`` ZCML directive: ``traverse``. If you would like
to cause the ``context`` to be something other than the ``root``
object when this route matches, you can spell a traversal pattern as
the ``traverse`` argument. This traversal pattern will be used as
the traversal path: traversal will begin at the root object implied
by this route (either the global root, or the object returned by the
``factory`` associated with this route).
The syntax of the ``traverse`` argument is the same as it is for
``path``. For example, if the ``path`` provided is
``articles/:article/edit``, and the ``traverse`` argument provided
is ``/:article``, when a request comes in that causes the route to
match in such a way that the ``article`` match value is '1' (when
the request URI is ``/articles/1/edit``), the traversal path will be
generated as ``/1``. This means that the root object's
``__getitem__`` will be called with the name ``1`` during the
traversal phase. If the ``1`` object exists, it will become the
``context`` of the request. The Traversal narrative has more
information about traversal.
If the traversal path contains segment marker names which are not
present in the path argument, a runtime error will occur. The
``traverse`` pattern should not contain segment markers that do not
exist in the ``path``.
A similar combining of routing and traversal is available when a
route is matched which contains a ``*traverse`` remainder marker in
its path. The ``traverse`` argument allows you to associate route
patterns with an arbitrary traversal path without using a a
``*traverse`` remainder marker; instead you can use other match
information.
Note that the ``traverse`` argument is ignored when attached to a
route that has a ``*traverse`` remainder marker in its path.
|
|
information
|
|
``view_path_info``, ``view_request_method``, ``view_request_param``,
and ``view_containment`` predicate arguments from the
``Configurator.add_route`` argument list. These arguments were
speculative. If you need the features exposed by these arguments,
add a view associated with a route using the ``route_name`` argument
to the ``add_view`` method instead.
- Remove ``view_header``, ``view_accept``, ``view_xhr``,
``view_path_info``, ``view_request_method``, ``view_request_param``,
and ``view_containment`` predicate arguments from the ``route`` ZCML
directive attribute set. These attributes were speculative. If you
need the features exposed by these attributes, add a view associated
with a route using the ``route_name`` attribute of the ``view`` ZCML
directive instead.
|
|
|
|
---------
- When the ``Configurator`` is passed an instance of
``zope.component.registry.Components`` as a ``registry`` constructor
argument, fix the instance up to have the attributes we expect of an
instance of ``repoze.bfg.registry.Registry`` when ``setup_registry``
is called. This makes it possible to use the global Zope component
registry as a BFG application registry.
Documentation
-------------
- Change renderings of ZCML directive documentation.
- Add a narrative documentation chapter: "Using the Zope Component
Architecture in ``repoze.bfg``"
|
|
directives made it hard to read.
|
