| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
the "phash" branch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge a bunch of paper-based docs fixes
Configure logging during bfgshell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
code.
|
|
|
|
--------
- The ``Configurator.add_view`` method now accepts an argument named
``context``. This is an alias for the older argument named
``for_``; it is preferred over ``for_``, but ``for_`` will continue
to be supported "forever".
- The ``view`` ZCML directive now accepts an attribute named
``context``. This is an alias for the older attribute named
``for``; it is preferred over ``for``, but ``for`` will continue to
be supported "forever".
- The ``Configurator.add_route`` method now accepts an argument named
``view_context``. This is an alias for the older argument named
``view_for``; it is preferred over ``view_for``, but ``view_for``
will continue to be supported "forever".
- The ``route`` ZCML directive now accepts an attribute named
``view_context``. This is an alias for the older attribute named
``view_for``; it is preferred over ``view_for``, but ``view_for``
will continue to be supported "forever".
Documentation and Paster Templates
----------------------------------
- All uses of the ``Configurator.add_view`` method that used its
``for_`` argument now use the ``context``argument instead.
- All uses of the ``Configurator.add_route`` method that used its
``view_for`` argument now use the ``view_context``argument instead.
- All uses of the ``view`` ZCML directive that used its ``for``
attribute now use the ``context`` attribute instead.
- All uses of the ``route`` ZCML directive that used its ``view_for``
attribute now use the ``view_context`` attribute instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This section contains detailed ZCML directive information, some of
which was removed from various narrative chapters.
|
|
untestable code blocks from being tested.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Explain use of renderers (somewhat redundantly) in the templates chapter.
|
|
|
|
documentation chapter explaining the effect of raising
``repoze.bfg.exceptions.NotFound`` and
``repoze.bfg.exceptions.Forbidden`` from within view code.
- When the ``repoze.bfg.exceptions.NotFound`` or
``repoze.bfg.exceptions.Forbidden`` error is raised from within a
custom root factory or the ``factory`` of a route, the appropriate
response is now sent to the requesting user agent (the result of the
notfound view or the forbidden view, respectively). When these
errors are raised from within a root factory, the ``context`` passed
to the notfound or forbidden view will be ``None``. Also, the
request will not be decorated with ``view_name``, ``subpath``,
``context``, etc. as would normally be the case if traversal had
been allowed to take place.
|
|
|
|
event subscriber, as other predicates are now usually an easier way
to get this done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
documentation.
- Minor typo fixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chapter.
|
|
|
|
from webob import Response
from repoze.bfg.view import bfg_view
class MyView(object):
def __init__(self, context, request):
self.context = context
self.request = request
@bfg_view(name='hello')
def amethod(self):
return Response('hello from %s!' % self.context)
When the bfg_view decorator is used against a class method, a view
is registered for the *class* (it's a "class view" where the "attr"
happens to be the method they're attached to), so the view class
must have a suitable constructor.
|
|
any number of others. Each invocation of the decorator registers a
single view. For instance, the following combination of decorators
and a function will register two views::
from repoze.bfg.view import bfg_view
@bfg_view(name='edit')
@bfg_view(name='change')
def edit(context, request):
pass
This makes it possible to associate more than one view configuration
for a single callable without requiring ZCML.
|
