| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tutorials and paster templates (no longer required).
|
|
to :app:`Pyramid`. A custom role setting was added to ``docs/conf.py`` to
allow for this. (internal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge a bunch of paper-based docs fixes
Configure logging during bfgshell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--------
- The ``Configurator`` object now has two new methods: ``begin`` and
``end``. The ``begin`` method is meant to be called before any
"configuration" begins (e.g. before ``add_view``, et. al are
called). The ``end`` method is meant to be called after all
"configuration" is complete.
Previously, before there was imperative configuration at all (1.1
and prior), configuration begin and end was invariably implied by
the process of loading a ZCML file. When a ZCML load happened, the
threadlocal data structure containing the request and registry was
modified before the load, and torn down after the load, making sure
that all framework code that needed ``get_current_registry`` for the
duration of the ZCML load was satisfied.
Some API methods called during imperative configuration, (such as
``Configurator.add_view`` when a renderer is involved) end up for
historical reasons calling ``get_current_registry``. However, in
1.2a5 and below, the Configurator supplied no functionality that
allowed people to make sure that ``get_current_registry`` returned
the registry implied by the configurator being used. ``begin`` now
serves this purpose. Inversely, ``end`` pops the thread local
stack, undoing the actions of ``begin``.
We make this boundary explicit to reduce the potential for confusion
when the configurator is used in different circumstances (e.g. in
unit tests and app code vs. just in initial app setup).
Existing code written for 1.2a1-1.2a5 which does not call ``begin``
or ``end`` continues to work in the same manner it did before. It
is however suggested that this code be changed to call ``begin`` and
``end`` to reduce the potential for confusion in the future.
- All ``paster`` templates which generate an application skeleton now
make use of the new ``begin`` and ``end`` methods of the
Configurator they use in their respective copies of ``run.py`` and
``tests.py``.
Documentation
-------------
- All documentation that makes use of a ``Configurator`` object to do
application setup and test setup now makes use of the new ``begin``
and ``end`` methods of the configurator.
Bug Fixes
---------
- When a ``repoze.bfg.exceptions.NotFound`` or
``repoze.bfg.exceptions.Forbidden`` *class* (as opposed to instance)
was raised as an exception within a root factory (or route root
factory), the exception would not be caught properly by the
``repoze.bfg.`` Router and it would propagate to up the call stack,
as opposed to rendering the not found view or the forbidden view as
would have been expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
a API chapter documenting the ``repoze.bfg.threadlocals`` module.
|
|
|
|
unittesting chapter.
|
|
function populates a component registry from a ZCML file for testing
purposes.
|
|
documentation chapter.
|
|
--------
- Add ``setUp`` and ``tearDown`` functions to the
``repoze.bfg.testing`` module. Using ``setUp`` in a test setup and
``tearDown`` in a test teardown is now the recommended way to do
component registry setup and teardown. Previously, it was
recommended that a single function named
``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp`` be called in both the test setup and
tear down. ``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp`` still exists (and will
exist "forever" due to its widespread use); it is now just an alias
for ``repoze.bfg.testing.setUp`` and is nominally deprecated.
- The BFG component registry is now available in view and event
subscriber code as an attribute of the request
ie. ``request.registry``. This fact is currently undocumented
except for this note, because BFG developers never need to interact
with the registry directly anywhere else.
- The BFG component registry now inherits from ``dict``, meaning that
it can optionally be used as a simple dictionary. *Component*
registrations performed against it via e.g. ``registerUtility``,
``registerAdapter``, and similar API methods are kept in a
completely separate namespace than its dict members, so using the
its component API methods won't effect the keys and values in the
dictionary namespace. Likewise, though the component registry
"happens to be" a dictionary, use of mutating dictionary methods
such as ``__setitem__`` will have no influence on any component
registrations made against it. In other words, the registry object
you obtain via e.g. ``repoze.bfg.threadlocal.get_current_registry``
or ``request.registry`` happens to be both a component registry and
a dictionary, but using its component-registry API won't impact data
added to it via its dictionary API and vice versa. This is a
forward compatibility move based on the goals of "marco".
Documentation
-------------
- Various tutorial test modules updated to use
``repoze.bfg.testing.setUp`` and ``repoze.bfg.testing.tearDown``
methods in order to encourage this as best practice going forward.
Backwards Incompatibilities
---------------------------
- Importing ``getSiteManager`` and ``get_registry`` from
``repoze.bfg.registry`` is no longer supported. These imports were
deprecated in repoze.bfg 1.0. Import of ``getSiteManager`` should
be done as ``from zope.component import getSiteManager``. Import of
``get_registry`` should be done as ``from repoze.bfg.threadlocal
import get_current_registry``. This was done to prevent a circular
import dependency.
- Code bases which alternately invoke both
``zope.testing.cleanup.cleanUp`` and ``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp``
(treating them equivalently, using them interchangeably) in the
setUp/tearDown of unit tests will begin to experience test failures
due to lack of test isolation. The "right" mechanism is
``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp`` (or the combination of
``repoze.bfg.testing.setUp`` and
``repoze.bfg.testing.tearDown``). but a good number of legacy
codebases will use ``zope.testing.cleanup.cleanUp`` instead. We
support ``zope.testing.cleanup.cleanUp`` but not in combination with
``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp`` in the same codebase. You should use
one or the other test cleanup function in a single codebase, but not
both.
Internal
--------
- Created new ``repoze.bfg.configuration`` module which assumes
responsibilities previously held by the ``repoze.bfg.registry`` and
``repoze.bfg.router`` modules (avoid a circular import dependency).
- The result of the ``zope.component.getSiteManager`` function in unit
tests set up with ``repoze.bfg.testing.cleanUp`` or
``repoze.bfg.testing.setUp`` will be an instance of
``repoze.bfg.registry.Registry`` instead of the global
``zope.component.globalregistry.base`` registry. This also means
that the threadlocal ZCA API functions such as ``getAdapter`` and
``getUtility`` as well as internal BFG machinery (such as
``model_url`` and ``route_url``) will consult this registry within
unit tests. This is a forward compatibility move based on the goals
of "marco".
- Removed ``repoze.bfg.testing.addCleanUp`` function and associated
module-scope globals. This was never an API.
|
|
deprecated in favor of
``repoze.bfg.testing.registerTemplateRenderer``. A deprecation
warning is *not* issued at import time for the former name; it will
exist "forever".
- The ``repoze.bfg.templating.renderer_from_cache`` function has been
moved to ``repoze.bfg.renderer.template_renderer_factory``. This
was never an API, but code in the wild was spotted that used it. A
deprecation warning is issued at import time for the former.
- Better error message when a wrapper view returns None.
|
|
|
|
tests can still use that function indefinitely. However, for
maximum forward compatibility, they should import ``cleanUp`` from
``repoze.bfg.testing`` instead of from ``zope.testing.cleanup``.
The BFG paster templates and docs have been changed to use this
function instead of the ``zope.testing.cleanup`` version.
|
|
method accepts keyword arguments. Each key/value pair in the
keyword arguments causes an assertion to be made that the renderer
received this key with a value equal to the asserted value.
- Projects generated by the paster templates now use the
``DummyTemplateRenderer.assert_`` method in their view tests.
|
|
- Rather than prepare the "stock" implementations of the ZCML
directives from the ``zope.configuration`` package for use under
:mod:`repoze.bfg`, :mod:`repoze.bfg` now makes available the
implementations of directives from the ``repoze.zcml`` package
(see http://static.repoze.org/zcmldocs). As a result, the
:mod:`repoze.bfg` package now depends on the ``repoze.zcml``
package, and no longer depends directly on the ``zope.component``,
``zope.configuration``, ``zope.interface``, or ``zope.proxy``
packages.
The primary reason for this change is to enable us to eventually
reduce the number of inappropriate :mod:`repoze.bfg` Zope package
dependencies, as well as to shed features of dependent package
directives that don't make sense for :mod:`repoze.bfg`.
Note that currently the set of requirements necessary to use bfg
has not changed. This is due to inappropriate Zope package
requirements in ``chameleon.zpt``, which will hopefully be
remedied soon.
- BFG applications written prior to this release which expect the
"stock" ``zope.component`` ZCML directive implementations
(e.g. ``adapter``, ``subscriber``, or ``utility``) to function now
must either 1) include the ``meta.zcml`` file from
``zope.component`` manually (e.g. ``<include
package="zope.component" file="meta.zcml">``) and include the
``zope.security`` package as an ``install_requires`` dependency or
2) change the ZCML in their applications to use the declarations
from `repoze.zcml <http://static.repoze.org/zcmldocs/>`_ instead
of the stock declarations. ``repoze.zcml`` only makes available
the ``adapter``, ``subscriber`` and ``utility`` directives.
- The ``http://namespaces.repoze.org/bfg`` XML namespace is now the
default XML namespace in ZCML for paster-generated applications.
- The copies of BFG's ``meta.zcml`` and ``configure.zcml`` were
removed from the root of the ``repoze.bfg`` package. In 0.3.6, a
new package named ``repoze.bfg.includes`` was added, which
contains the "correct" copies of these ZCML files; the ones that
were removed were for backwards compatibility purposes.
Other
- The minimum requirement for ``chameleon.core`` is now 1.0b13. The
minimum requirement for ``chameleon.zpt`` is now 1.0b7. The
minimum requirement for ``chameleon.genshi`` is now 1.0b2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add minimal documentation of BFGTestCase.
|
|
- Added a ``repoze.bfg.testing`` module to attempt to make it
slightly easier to write unittest-based automated tests of BFG
applications. Information about this class is in the
documentation.
- The default template renderer now supports testing better by
looking for ``ITestingTemplateRenderer`` using a relative
pathname. This is exposed indirectly through the API named
``registerTemplate`` in ``repoze.bfg.testing``.
Deprecations
- The names ``repoze.bfg.interfaces.ITemplate`` ,
``repoze.bfg.interfaces.ITemplateFactory`` and
``repoze.bfg.interfaces.INodeTemplate`` have been deprecated.
These should now be imported as
``repoze.bfg.interfaces.ITemplateRenderer`` and
``repoze.bfg.interfaces.ITemplateRendererFactory``, and
``INodeTemplateRenderer`` respectively.
- The name ``repoze.bfg.chameleon_zpt.ZPTTemplateFactory`` is
deprecated. Use ``repoze.bfg.chameleon_zpt.ZPTTemplateRenderer``.
- The name ``repoze.bfg.chameleon_genshi.GenshiTemplateFactory`` is
deprecated. Use
``repoze.bfg.chameleon_genshi.GenshiTemplateRenderer``.
- The name ``repoze.bfg.xslt.XSLTemplateFactory`` is deprecated.
Use ``repoze.bfg.xslt.XSLTemplateRenderer``.
|
