summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/tutorials/cmf
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/tutorials/cmf')
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/actions.rst2
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/catalog.rst2
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/content.rst6
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst12
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/skins.rst2
-rw-r--r--docs/tutorials/cmf/workflow.rst2
6 files changed, 13 insertions, 13 deletions
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/actions.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/actions.rst
index 0de6d580d..8af8e5fd4 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/actions.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/actions.rst
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ In CMF, the "actions tool" along with "action providers" create an
extensible mechanism to show links in the CMF management UI that
invoke a particular behavior or which show a particular template.
-:mod:`pyramid` itself has no such concept, and no package provides
+:app:`Pyramid` itself has no such concept, and no package provides
a direct replacement. Actions are such a generic concept that it's
simple to reimplement action-like navigation in a different way within
any given application. For example, a module-scope global dictionary
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/catalog.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/catalog.rst
index 11a9483a6..d5e9534ae 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/catalog.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/catalog.rst
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The main feature of the CMF catalog is that it filters search results
from the Zope 2 "catalog" based on the requesting user's ability to
view a particular cataloged object.
-:mod:`pyramid` itself has no cataloging facility, but an addon
+:app:`Pyramid` itself has no cataloging facility, but an addon
package named :term:`repoze.catalog` offers similar functionality.
Creating an Allowed Index
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/content.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/content.rst
index a8b2b8124..85e5b5fbc 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/content.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/content.rst
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ code which generates an instance of that content. It is possible to
construct and enumerate content types using APIs defined on the types
tool.
-:mod:`pyramid` itself has no such concept, but an addon package named
+:app:`Pyramid` itself has no such concept, but an addon package named
:term:`repoze.lemonade` has a barebones replacement.
Factory Type Information
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ initial view name, a factory, and a number of security settings with a
type name. Each type information object knows how to manufacture
content objects that match its type.
-:mod:`pyramid` certainly enforces none of these concepts in any
+:app:`Pyramid` certainly enforces none of these concepts in any
particular way, but :term:`repoze.lemonade` does.
``repoze.lemonade`` Content
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ of helper functions which allow you to:
content-agnostic unit tests or if you need to get an
enumerated subset of content type information to aid in UI
generation. That said, this *is* a tutorial about how to
- get CMF-like features in :mod:`pyramid`, so we'll assume
+ get CMF-like features in :app:`Pyramid`, so we'll assume
the pattern is useful to readers.
See the `repoze.lemonade package
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst
index 65ad99551..94c73af8e 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst
@@ -1,21 +1,21 @@
-Converting an Existing Zope/CMF Application to :mod:`pyramid`
+Converting an Existing Zope/CMF Application to :app:`Pyramid`
================================================================
The Zope `Content Management Framework
<http://www.zope.org/Products/CMF/>`_ (aka CMF) is a layer on top of
:term:`Zope` 2 that provides facilities for creating content-driven
websites. It's reasonably easy to convert a modern Zope/CMF
-application to :mod:`pyramid`.
+application to :app:`Pyramid`.
-The main difference between CMF and :mod:`pyramid` is that
-:mod:`pyramid` does not advertise itself as a system into which you
+The main difference between CMF and :app:`Pyramid` is that
+:app:`Pyramid` does not advertise itself as a system into which you
can plug arbitrary "packages" that extend a system-supplied management
user interface. You *could* build a CMF-like layer on top of
-:mod:`pyramid` (as CMF is built on Zope) but none currently exists.
+:app:`Pyramid` (as CMF is built on Zope) but none currently exists.
For those sorts of high-extensibility, highly-regularized-UI systems,
CMF is still the better choice.
-:mod:`pyramid` (and other more lightweight systems) is often a
+:app:`Pyramid` (and other more lightweight systems) is often a
better choice when you're building the a user interface from scratch,
which often happens when the paradigms of some CMF-provided user
interface don't match the requirements of an application very closely.
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/skins.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/skins.rst
index 7ec3b1be6..676a076b3 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/skins.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/skins.rst
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ products often provide skin layers that are activated within a
particular skin to provide the site with additional features.
To override static resources using a "search path" much like a set of
-skin layers, :mod:`pyramid` provides the concept of
+skin layers, :app:`Pyramid` provides the concept of
:term:`resource` overrides. See :ref:`overriding_resources_section`
for more information about resource overrides.
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/workflow.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/workflow.rst
index 35cf552d2..cc70d771a 100644
--- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/workflow.rst
+++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/workflow.rst
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Workflow
In CMF, the "workflow tool" allows developers to design state machines
which imply transition between content states.
-:mod:`pyramid` itself has no such concept, but the
+:app:`Pyramid` itself has no such concept, but the
:term:`repoze.workflow` package provides a simple state machine
implementation that can act as a barebones workflow tool. See its
documentation for more information.