diff options
| author | Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com> | 2010-11-28 15:26:05 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com> | 2010-11-28 15:26:05 -0500 |
| commit | 6edcaca6130518bced8d1467282181fee78d799e (patch) | |
| tree | a07cafce67e2422947ff545236bee4dc627da944 /docs | |
| parent | 16cd50c1a5beef98c3297d105c1ccffccb8872c5 (diff) | |
| download | pyramid-6edcaca6130518bced8d1467282181fee78d799e.tar.gz pyramid-6edcaca6130518bced8d1467282181fee78d799e.tar.bz2 pyramid-6edcaca6130518bced8d1467282181fee78d799e.zip | |
remove awkward wording
Diffstat (limited to 'docs')
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst | 13 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst b/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst index 94c73af8e..26aa336a9 100644 --- a/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst +++ b/docs/tutorials/cmf/index.rst @@ -7,13 +7,12 @@ The Zope `Content Management Framework websites. It's reasonably easy to convert a modern Zope/CMF application to :app:`Pyramid`. -The main difference between CMF and :app:`Pyramid` is that -:app:`Pyramid` does not advertise itself as a system into which you -can plug arbitrary "packages" that extend a system-supplied management -user interface. You *could* build a CMF-like layer on top of -:app:`Pyramid` (as CMF is built on Zope) but none currently exists. -For those sorts of high-extensibility, highly-regularized-UI systems, -CMF is still the better choice. +The main difference between CMF and :app:`Pyramid` is that :app:`Pyramid` +does not advertise itself as a system into which you can plug arbitrary +"packages" that extend a system-supplied management user interface. You +*could* build a CMF-like layer on top of :app:`Pyramid` but none currently +exists. For those sorts of high-extensibility, highly-regularized-UI +systems, CMF is still the better choice. :app:`Pyramid` (and other more lightweight systems) is often a better choice when you're building the a user interface from scratch, |