summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>2010-12-24 20:42:57 -0500
committerChris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>2010-12-24 20:42:57 -0500
commit0bdbdfe36bcf920617953dafba198418cdcaa2fa (patch)
treed6d0163b1f1062915d90e72351f31050c21e96cd
parent5c645f6a21a7fa11014d2c29854c0de5df36abea (diff)
downloadpyramid-0bdbdfe36bcf920617953dafba198418cdcaa2fa.tar.gz
pyramid-0bdbdfe36bcf920617953dafba198418cdcaa2fa.tar.bz2
pyramid-0bdbdfe36bcf920617953dafba198418cdcaa2fa.zip
wording
-rw-r--r--docs/designdefense.rst5
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/docs/designdefense.rst b/docs/designdefense.rst
index f3a29b2d1..24fa606f8 100644
--- a/docs/designdefense.rst
+++ b/docs/designdefense.rst
@@ -77,7 +77,8 @@ form a plan to "merge". The features missing from BFG (notably :term:`view
handler` classes, flash messaging, and other minor missing bits), were added,
to provide familiarity to ex-Pylons users. The result is :app:`Pyramid`.
-We're truly hoping that the amalgamation of components in :app:`Pyramid` will
+The Python web framework space is currently notoriously balkanized. We're
+truly hoping that the amalgamation of components in :app:`Pyramid` will
appeal to at least two currently very distinct sets of users: Pylons and BFG
(often ex-Zope) users. By unifying the best concepts from Pylons and BFG
into a single codebase and leaving the bad concepts from their ancestors
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@ promote our efforts as a unit rather than competing pointlessly. We hope to
be able to shortcut the pack mentality which results in a *much larger*
duplication of effort, represented by competing but incredibly similar
applications and libraries, each built upon a specific low level stack that
-is incompatible with any other. We'll also shrink the choice of credible
+is incompatible with the other. We'll also shrink the choice of credible
Python web frameworks down by at least one. Some overlap of functionality to
achieve these goals is expected and unavoidable, at least if we aim to
prevent pointless duplication at higher levels. If we've done our job well