| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
See https://github.com/tox-dev/tox/issues/2636 - without the rename, tox
fails to recognize the configuration for flake8, as there is a
(non-testenv) section named the same.
|
|
The Poetry FAQ[1] gives some options on how tox and poetry can be used
together, since both of them want to do the virtual env managing. Since
we mostly want to use tox as a venv manager and to easily run multiple
linters, and we want to have poetry do the dependency management, the
method of explicitely using `poetry install` seems to be the most
reasonable. This means we don't have to generate a requirements.txt file
or make duplicated listings of our dependencies in tox.ini.
[1]: https://python-poetry.org/docs/master/faq/#is-tox-supported
|
|
This seems like something we should do rather earlier than later. Using
black takes away the pain of manually formatting the code, adhering to
the style guidelines and it takes away bikeshedding over minor things.
|
|
It would be nice to gradually improve the typing situation in Fietsboek.
At least the parts that do not do heavy metaprogramming should have
types. For most of the API, we already have types in the doc strings, so
those could be removed then.
|
|
setup.py is the very old style for packaging, so I wanted to replace it
with something more "modern". pyproject.toml seems like the way to go in
the future.
At first, I wanted to simply configure setuptools using pyproject.toml,
but that support is in beta and seemed to cause some issues with the tox
virtualenvs.
Poetry seems to work fine and provides a better dependency resolver
(given that dependencies are actually specified well) and some other
goodies. For users, nothing much should change, as "pip install" still
works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
