aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/analyzers/mod.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-11-22add Twisted CastleDaniel Schadt
There's not many useful things we can do with this log, other than providing a way for downstream applications to identify those logs.
2021-11-16Add Statues of GrenthDaniel Schadt
2021-11-13Implement the River of Souls encounterDaniel Schadt
2021-11-13add bandit trio encounter & boss IDsDaniel Schadt
2021-11-12Add kitty golem encounters from the training areaDaniel Schadt
2020-09-29return Outcome::Success if a raid was rewardedDaniel Schadt
If the reward has been given out, we can be 99.9% sure that the fight succeeded, in which case we don't need to do any other convuluted checking. This has the benefit of catching some false-negatives (edge cases in success detection), at the cost of making the detection a bit ... weirder, in the sense that a log's success might now depend on whether it was the first kill in the week or not. However, given that our sucess detection works pretty well overall, I'd say it's worth to catch a few more false-negatives and try to classify as many logs correctly as possible. At least, this does not introduce any false-positives.
2020-09-23rename Boss to EncounterDaniel Schadt
This is the first step in differentiating between Encounters and Bosses. It sounds a bit weird at first, but there are some events without any bosses (like the River of Souls), and some events which have multiple bosses (like Twin Largos or the kodan strike mission). If we want to support this better, without relying on extra IDs, special casing and constants (like NIKARE_ID), we should differentiate between Encounters and Bosses.
2020-09-23add Sunqua Peak/Ai ID and analyzer logicDaniel Schadt
2020-07-23more documentation & adjustmentsDaniel Schadt
2020-07-23remove default implementation of Analyzer::outcomeDaniel Schadt
This was only there to make it easier to gradually implement the outcome method for the individual bosses. Now that each boss has a proper outcome, we no longer need the default method - in fact, I'd rather make sure the compiler tells us if we forget to implement this method in a new analyzer.
2020-07-23implement strike AnalyzersDaniel Schadt
2020-07-23implement proper outcome for w1-w4Daniel Schadt
It turns out that `was_rewarded` is a pretty bad heuristic if you ever kill a boss a second time per week (basically, was_rewarded=false does not imply that the boss was unsuccessful). Therefore, we need a proper detection of when a fight failed and when a fight succeeded. This is the first batch that implements this as part of the Analyzer trait for bosses of wings 1 to 4.
2020-06-28start implementing analyzersDaniel Schadt
It turns out that the different encounters do require quite some encounter-specific logic, not only to determine whether the CM was activated, but also to determine whether the fight was successful, the duration of the fight, later the phases, ... Wrapping all of this in pre-defined "triggers" (like CmTrigger) feels like it will be a bit unfitting, so with this patch we have introduced the evtclib::Analyzer, which can be used to analyze the fights. Currently, the whole CM detection logic has been moved to this new interface, and soon we also want the success-detection logic in there. The tests pass and the interface of Log::is_cm is unchanged.