| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The EoD elite specs and strikes are not fully implemented yet, but
delaying this release until they are would be a bit silly. After all,
the old version cannot parse any log that has a new elite spec in it.
Therefore, 0.7.0 shall be released with EoD elite spec support, so that
downstream applications can be updated.
We can always improve the EoD strike situation and implement proper
analyzers later. As far as I can tell, Elite-Insights also does not
parse them correctly just yet.
|
|
|
|
This is the one thing that prevents evtclib from parsing new logs, as we
can handle unknown bosses, but no unknown elite specs.
|
|
|
|
There's not many useful things we can do with this log, other than
providing a way for downstream applications to identify those logs.
|
|
|
|
With a new release being on the way (and long overdue), it's time to get
the CHANGELOG up to date with what actually happened since v0.5.0.
|
|
|
|
If we already have an Encounter, it might be nice to determine the game
mode from it as well - without needing to go through the whole log
first.
This is especially useful for raidgrep, where we can use the early
filters - which don't have access to the whole Log item.
|
|
For a lot of applications, it can be useful to distinguish between logs
made in raids, fractals, ...
Note that we probably don't want further categorization (as for example
done in ezau).
|
|
|
|
Overall, evtclib is doing quite well on the .unwrap()/.expect()/panic!()
calls, except for some doctests (which can be changed at some point) and
the actual tests.
One case where we do panic (and should document it!) is Log::boss. The
documentation has been added there.
Another (rare if not impossible for proper evtc files) case was the
conversion of the language event, which assumed that we will definitely
be able to convert the u64 to the right language. In all normal cases
this should be true, but if evtclib deals with untrusted input, we might
not want to panic a whole program because someone smuggled in a
malicious file.
|
|
The wording on the evtc README is
> an npcid of 1 indicates log is generic - triggers by squadmember
> entering combat and not as a result of a boss species id.
It is not quite clear whether "generic" implies WvW or if there are PvE
generic logs as well if you manage to set up arcdps in the right way.
Therefore, the wording in evtclib is rather unspecific as well.
|
|
The old code seemed to choke on WvW players, as the subgroup-calculating
code did 0 - b'0', which underflowed. The proper way to parse a subgroup
is not to take a single character anyway, because subgroups can be
bigger than 10.
The new code fixes that by properly extracting the "subgroup str
literal" and then parsing it as an integer, with some special logic to
detect an "empty" subgroup as it is in WvW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
It makes sense to expose this logic as a function, as other programs
like raidgrep might want to use the same logic when dealing with partial
evtc files.
|
|
If the reward has been given out, we can be 99.9% sure that the fight
succeeded, in which case we don't need to do any other convuluted
checking. This has the benefit of catching some false-negatives (edge
cases in success detection), at the cost of making the detection a bit
... weirder, in the sense that a log's success might now depend on
whether it was the first kill in the week or not.
However, given that our sucess detection works pretty well overall, I'd
say it's worth to catch a few more false-negatives and try to classify
as many logs correctly as possible. At least, this does not introduce
any false-positives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Sunqua Peak patch released on 2020-09-15 shifted fractals around
(notably moving the old CMs to 98 & 99), which messed with the boss
health in those fractals. As a result, the Skorvald CM detection (which
relied on the health of Skorvald being higher in CM) was broken.
This patch introduces a fallback mechanism which relies on the
split-phase anomalies, as those are still different in the CM. It should
be 100% accurate, as long as players actually make it to the split
phase. Before that, we currently have to assume that the fight is
non-CM, even if it's a log from a CM wiping before first split phase.
There is some discussion in the Elite-Insights Discord here[1] about
this change.
[1]: https://discordapp.com/channels/456611641526845473/718866714527399976/755914037354692648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since downstream applications will also print this, we should remove it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherwise the text will be garbled (reversed and probably cut short).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
